Thursday, 17 March 2016
Press Statement 17th March 2016
In July 2014 a unique part of the World’s shared cultural heritage, the beautiful, four thousand year
old statue of the Egyptian Scribe Sekhemka, was privatised and locked away from view thanks to the
unethical actions of David Mackintosh MP, Northampton Borough Council and the, apparently,
morality free auction industry who, ignoring ethical objections, put the importance of obtaining a
world record price for an internationally important museum piece over the retention of it in a
museum for everyone to enjoy.
On 29 March 2016 the Culture Secretary, John Whittingdale, and his accomplice, Ed Vaizey, will lift
the temporary export ban the Department of Culture, Media and Sports (DCMS) placed on the
Sekhemka statue and it will almost certainly disappear from public view, possibly forever.
In all that time, as far as we are aware, there has been no effort by the British Government or any
British institution or museum to negotiate a loan with the anonymous purchaser to ensure the
statue finds a secure and permanent home in the UK.
This fact surely shows how totally unfit for purpose the current Export Ban system is. The Secretary
of State is able to impose a Temporary Export Ban because an object is seen as of national
importance, but can then happily sit back and do precisely nothing to ensure that such importance is
being recognised by the object being saved for the nation.
This willing impotence is even more unacceptable when all relevant bodies, including the
Government’s own statutory advisers such as Arts Council England, agree that the sale of Sekhemka
was utterly unethical and should never have taken place, particularly as there remain unresolved
legal questions surrounding the sale.
The Sekhemka Action Group has noted the gallant appeal by the Egyptian Ambassador to wealthy
Egyptians asking them to raise funds to repurchase Sekhemka; if this succeeds the statue would be
on display in Egypt for six months of the year and then in the UK for the next six months.
The offer is especially generous because the sale of Sekhemka has damaged the British reputation in
Egypt, suggesting to Egyptians that Britain’s comments that it seeks to stamp out trafficking in
antiquities are just public relations and that Egyptian Cultural objects are nothing more than a
cheque to be cashed at the bank.
However, the Save Sekhemka Action Group maintains that such a repurchase would be unethical
and unhelpful since the statue should not have been sold in the first place.
We also believe that a repurchase would send strong signals to other museums and institutions that
selling a valuable artefact would be acceptable since there would be the expectation that there will
always be somebody who would stump up the cash to repurchase it for the nation.
We are therefore resigned to the likelihood that we will never see this wonderful statue again and
that this stage of our fight to “rescue” Sekhemka and return him to a free public gallery is over.
However, this does not mean that we will shrink into a corner doing nothing. Our anger and
frustration at a broken system and the people, who either exploited it or who stood by wringing
their hands, crying crocodile tears but doing nothing to prevent that exploitation, requires that we
do not.
We recognise that the British museum world is in dire straits and, based on our experience with
Sekhemka and the numerous other cases of museum closures and object disposal, any attempt to
rescue it is not going to be led by the Department of Culture, Media and Sports, Arts Council England or the Museums Association. These bodies have demonstrated no practical initiative or leadership at a time when we are faced by unaccountable elites who can close or reassign a collection from one part of the country to another (usually London) at will, and supposedly accountable politicians who are quite happy to ride rough shod over ethics and even legal questions, to cash in and destroy overnight collections, museums and galleries which have taken decades if not centuries to build up. With Arts Council England and the Museums Association ultimately toothless in the absence of either the legal tools or the corporate will to protect the nation’s heritage it is up to us, ordinary people, to try to stop the cultural rot before all trace of the past disappears and with that the chance to show our children what we can be and what wonders we can create.
In that belief there is hope. All over the country people are fighting back against the attempts to create cultural wastelands in the name of austerity and efficiency and we feel that our experience from the Sekhemka campaign would benefit these various campaigns. For that reason we intend constituting ourselves into a new campaign group and return to the fight.
Sekhemka was a battle, not the entire war, which is far from over.
Gunilla Loe, Chair
On behalf of
the Save Sekhemka Action Group, Great Britain
and
the Save Sekhemka Action Group, Egypt
Friday, 2 October 2015
The Extension of the Export Ban on the Statue of Sekhemka
The Action Groups are delighted to learn that the Department of Culture, Media and Sports and its Secretary of State, the Hon John Whittingdale MP, and its Minister for Arts, the Hon Ed Vaizey MP, have seen cultural sense by extending the Export Ban on the Sekhemka statue until 29 March 2016, thus hopefully ensuring that it remains in the UK.
We will continue to monitor the situation. Meanwhile we sincerely hope that negotiations with the, as yet, anonymous buyer and the current owner of Sekhemka will bear fruit and that one of the UK’s major museums will give the statue a new home – perhaps even the new museum complex proposed for the Olympic Park !
We also hope that this decision will discourage small and large museums from selling off their treasures and that there will be a way forward for the museum world in conjunction with the DCMS, Arts Council England and the Museums Association to KEEP collections intact for the enjoyment and education of future generations. We wish the museum world strength and tenacity making this possible in true co-operation with each other.
This decision also sends a very strong international message: the UK and its government will not stand idly by tolerating illegal sales of looted artefacts, smuggling of artefacts or laundering of money rather the UK will adhere to the strong ICOM ethics that enable our world heritage to remain intact.
The Action Groups wish to thank all their supporters and we are glad we stayed with the “fight” to save Sekhemka which we now hope will benefit the rest of the museum world and our heritage. We owe this to our future generations.
Gunilla Loe
On behalf of the Save Sekhemka Action Groups, UK and Egypt
Tuesday, 1 September 2015
Press Statement : September 1st 2015
Saturday, 22 August 2015
Dr Asaad in Palmyra
Details about Dr Asaad can be found here: http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/aug/18/isis-beheads-archaeologist-syria
Friday, 24 July 2015
Export ban expiry imminent but it is not too late.... yet
One of the principle reason for the international opposition to the sale was the increasing evidence that such sales benefit no-one except the international auction houses who see their profits increased and international terrorists and criminal gangs who fund their activities by trafficking and selling art and archaeological artefacts like the statue of Sekhemka. If auction house prices rise, so do the profits of the criminal and terrorist traffickers and forgers [2] .
We are also asking you to make clear that you deplore the sale of publicly held museum collections for profit in a way which can only drive up the prices and the rewards for such unethical behaviour.
The only thing preventing such an intervention is the will of the British Government to be seen to do the right thing, while your intervention will not just preserve a beautiful and uniquely evocative example of Egypt's ancient art and culture for the public and visitors to Britain to enjoy. It will send a message that Britain cares about the cultural jewels it has in its care and will not in future allow them to be exploited for short term gain in a way which only encourages criminals, traffickers and terrorists to set out to loot and sell more.
Tuesday, 21 April 2015
Sekhemka Export Ban Statement
re the TEMPORARY EXPORT BAN FOR THE SEKHEMKA STATUE
a) We will NOT be part of ANY fundraising attempt to buy the statue from the present owner.
-
What was the deal whereby Lord Northampton agreed not to challenge the sale and agreed to relinquish his legal right to the statue?
-
Why, when NBC told Christie’s that they owned Sekhemka, signed a sales agreement stating this and paid all the sales fees and premiums, was the Marquis of Northampton then paid over £6 million of public money?[vii]
- Was the £50,000+ which NBC spent on legal expenses in an apparently abortive attempt to show it owned Sekhemka a misuse of public money which in the end only benefited a private individual to the tune of over £6 million?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-northamptonshire-28428637
Monday, 30 March 2015
UK Government issues Export Ban on Sekhemka Statue!
The BBC are reporting that "Mr Vaizey made the decision following a recommendation by the Reviewing Committee on the Export of Works of Art and Objects of Cultural Interest (RCEWA), which is administered by Arts Council England."
The BBC also quote the RCEWA who are reported to have said that the statue was of "outstanding aesthetic importance" and was significant in the study of "the development of private statuary and funerary religion in Egypt and the history of human self-representation".
The Save Sekhemka Action Group are delighted that the Government has imposed a temporary export ban on the Statue of Sekhemka and we fervently hope that this will be upheld as a permanent ban on 29 July and Sekhemka, an internationally important work of Egyptian Art, will find a home in a public museum where it belongs.
The decision of the Reviewing Committee on the Export of Works of Art and Objects of Cultural Interest (RCEWA) to recommend the ban, not only vindicates our position as to the importance of Sekhemka as a work of art, but also provides much needed clarity as, until now today's announcement, we were not even able to establish that the buyer was from outside the UK. This was because while the statue is of international importance, was owned by the people of Northampton and was sold by a publicly accountable body, their Council, the process was carried out behind the cloak of privacy and commercial confidentiality.
If the statue of Sekhemka is to be lost to the people of Northampton who enjoyed it for over one hundred years we would like to see Sekhemka retained in the UK. The only problem is WHERE and HOW it could be retained and displayed since the sale itself was unethical and there is evidence it was also of doubtful legality. As a consequence none of the UK's major museums wished to acquire it unless it was GIVEN outright - a public body cannot buy something owned by another public body, it is unethical and a misapplication of public money.
We also understand that the Art Fund was outraged when we told them about the proposed sale and declared they would not then help raise funds for a purchase.
Northampton Borough Council committed an act of great folly selling the statue of Sekhmeka. Even greater was the folly when NBC agreed to buy off Lord Northampton to the tune of £7m thus halving their profit, rather than submitting to a transparent legal clarification of the statue's actual ownership. Now the consequences of this folly are even more apparent: Northampton museums have lost their Accreditation and with that all access to outside funding resulting in a loss of about a third of their income ( in our estimation) - This is not a good position from which to contemplate an extension to the Central Museum.
The Action Group will actively work to uphold the export ban through our many contacts and explore ways of how the statue can be kept in the UK.
Sunday, 2 November 2014
Lottery Grant for Northampton Shoe Exhibition Rejected
The consequences of the unethical actions of Northampton Borough Council are now being made clear as this week we learn that a £250k application for money to support our shoe collection has been refused.
The damage is already done - we tried to tell NBC, they wouldn't listen.
The Arts Council and the Heritage Lottery Fund have rules and ethics requirements clearly laid out for good reason.
Thursday, 30 October 2014
The Farewell Of The Save Sekhemka Action Group
Wednesday, 1 October 2014
Northampton Museums Service barred from Museums Association membership
Northampton Museums Service has been barred from Museum Association membership for at least five years.
David Fleming, chairman of the MA's Ethics Committee, said: “We do appreciate the huge financial pressure that many local authority museums are under at the present time, but the MA's Code of Ethics provides for such a sale only as a last resort after other sources of funding have been thoroughly explored. At a time when public finances are pressured it is all the more important that museum authorities behave in an ethical fashion in order to safeguard the long-term public interest. Museums have a duty to hold their collections in trust for society. They should not treat their collections as assets to be monetised for short-term gain."
We wholeheartedly agree and have been saying this for many months. Sadly the worst has happened for Northampton's museums.
You can read the decision in full here:
http://www.museumsassociation.org/news/01102014-ma-bars-northampton
Friday, 1 August 2014
Northampton Museum loses Accreditation due to Sekhemka sale
Thursday, 24 July 2014
Today Arts Council England decide on Accreditation for Northampton Museum
This news makes it all the more important that Arts Council England (ACE) and the Museums Association demonstrate the consequences of such unethical and damaging actions as selling publicly owned museum objects for short term profit, and punish Northampton Council by removing their Accredited status.
This will hurt and humiliate our Town in the short term, but at least it will serve as a warning to others who would try to cash in on the museum collections we hold in trust for the future. It might also prevent the Cllr Mackintosh and his Ruling Group from taking any more Government, Lottery and Charity grants under the false pretenses that they are professionally and ethically equipped to care for our culture and heritage.
Both keeping and losing accreditation are two terrible outcomes of this whole episode - the damage was already done when Sekhemka was sold.
A decision is expected from ACE within the next two weeks. The Museums Association will make a decision in September 2014.
Friday, 11 July 2014
Spinning Sekhemka
- We will continue to oppose the turning of Sekhemka into a commodity to be sold on the rich persons equivalent of E-bay, therefore we will oppose the export of the statue from the UK if that is what transpires, whoever the new owner of Sekhemka is. Particularly if that owner is a private individual who will not put Sekhemka on free public display. If Sekhemka is not to stay on open display in the UK his only legitimate destination is a public museum in Egypt.
- We will also continue to expose the way this unethical, unnecessary and short sighted sale was undertaken, the many legal and financial questions which surround the sale and the conduct in public office of those whose mission it became to rob Northampton of both a cultural jewel and its cultural credibility. We hope the local and national Media will join us in that quest for information and answers.
- We hope the media will also ask Cllr Mackintosh why he insisted on undermining confidence in the Conservative party's core policy in Arts and Culture, promoting philanthropy and donation. As Alan Moore has pointed out, thanks to the sale of Sekhemka, no-one would dream of donating something valuable to a public museum if at some stage it can be taken away and flogged off to the highest bidder in a commercial fire sale
Cllr Mackintosh and Northampton Borough Council announced last night that "...it will retain around £8million (55 per cent of the proceeds), while the remainder will be remitted to Lord Northampton (around £6million)."
- What the Council statement did not say was that the auction costs [around 15%] and taxes will be deducted from that figure, and we might also add the over £40,000 of council Tax payers money spent on legal advice to facilitate the sale. Thus the Council Tax payers of Northampton could see scarcely half of the headline figure spent in the Town, ring fenced or not.
- Equally, while the statement was open about the fact that the Marquis of Northampton will be receiving a windfall of over £5 million, the statement did not enlighten the Council Tax payers of Northampton why, when NBC allegedly "owned" Sekhemka, they will be adding to the fortune of the multimillionaire Marquis and paying for it by becoming pariahs in the museum and heritage world. Like the Museums Association, we believe that the ownership of Sekhemka was never legally resolved and we will be consulting with colleagues to see if an investigation can be mounted into whether Councillor Mackintosh and Northampton Borough Council misled the public, the media and Christie's by saying they did own the statue.
In the statement Cllr Mackintosh has also attempted to spin his way out of the almost universal condemnation his actions have caused to be dumped on Northampton's name and in particular the likelihood that Northampton will lose its Museums Association accreditation, along with the credibility in museum matters which it has already lost.
His statement says
"Work has already begun on drawing up detailed plans for the [museum] extension, which will underpin the growth of Northampton’s Cultural Quarter. The Borough Council is in the process of developing a funding package to take the extension forward, including putting together a bid for support from the Heritage Lottery Fund. The Council is also continuing to talk to the Arts Council about museum accreditation."
- We are sure it does. Councillor Mackintosh was explicitly warned by Arts Council England and the Museums Association Ethics Committee that Museums Association accreditation was in severe danger were Sekhemka to be sold and with it access to many significant funding streams to supply the £7-8 million which will still be required to build the still hypothetical museum extension, even with Sekhemka's cultural equivalent of blood money.
Cllr Mackintosh also said: "This money will allow us to realise our exciting plans for the future of the Museum Service. Every penny is ring-fenced for the Museum Service and we will now make our museum redevelopment plans a reality."
- We would point out that without the commitment to display the cream of all the collections and to hold a research archive curated by the specialist curatorial staff and teachers who have been made redundant or not replaced, the Museum Service has no future. Museums exist for their collections held in trust for the future and the expertise to display, describe and bring them to life for visitors and researchers.
- We would also point out there were no "Museum development plans" when Councillor Mackintosh first wanted to sell Sekhemka [such plans were first mentioned when it became clear that the original plan to allegedly give the money to the Delapre Abbey Trust was a non starter as far as the Museums Association Ethics Committee was concerned. There still are no such detailed, costed, plans. Unless you count a cafe and shoe shop with a small gallery space.
Q: What do you say to a Northampton Egyptologist?
A: Two Cappuccino's and a Skinny Latte please
For further comments, additional material including documents or images or to request interviews with members of the Save Our Sekhemka Action Group team please contact
Thursday, 10 July 2014
Sekhemka sells for £14m
Obviously we are heartbroken at what Cllr Mackintosh has caused to happen at Christie's tonight.
We hope you will understand this is a complex issue and we need to take some time to look at the details of the auction.
We will be issuing a full statement and offering interviews tomorrow (Friday)
Wednesday, 9 July 2014
Just 24 Hours to Go - Several things you can do
There are just twenty four hours left to prevent the "unethical sale" of the statue of Sekhemka at Christie's and the only way we can do that is to help the Egyptian Government's legal moves to prevent the sale of Sekhemka with a show of people power.
The Cabinet of Northampton Borough Council meets tonight to discuss the conservation of the Battlefield of Northampton. They are only doing this because local people worked together to prevent Council Leader David Mackintosh driving through a plan against all advice to bulid on the site. Now we need to show Cllr Mackintoish that he has another losing battle on his hands over the "unethical" sale of Sekhemka.
We are going to send this petition to every member of Northampton Council as well as Christies, the Marquis of Northampton and the Media but we need as many names on it as possible. If you haven't already done so please ask everyone you know or who you can contact to sign and share the link on the Social Media.
- Remember Councillor Mackintosh has not answered this key question- if Northampton Borough Council really owns the statue, why are they giving the Marquis of Northampton 45% of the sale price- that could be well over £2 million pounds?
- And why are the Council paying this huge amount of money to the Marquis when they have already spent over £40,000 to facilitate the sale and are paying all the legal and auction costs?
1. E-mail the Egyptian Embassy in London and thank them for intervening to protect the culture we share. Ask them to take out an injunction to stop the sale becaue the ownership of the statue is not clear.
The sale of Sekhemka is unethical, unecessary and counter productive and no-one in politics or the museums world has defended it except Councillor Mackintosh. The only person who will gain from the sale is the Marquis of Northampton, one of the richest men in Britain who will get over £2 million at no cost to himself. Please take this last chance to help defend the culture we share.
Monday, 7 July 2014
Egyptian Government in Late Legal Challenge
From: Ahram.org.eg
Full story: http://english.ahram.org.eg/News/105605.aspx
"Egyptian Antiquities Minister Mamdouh El-Damati has denounced the sale of the statue and described the museum's actions as incompatible with the values and role of museums worldwide, which he said should "spread culture" and not try to simply earn money."
"He called on the International Council of Museums (ICOM) to stop the sale on the grounds that it goes against the council's ethics."
Please sign and share our petition https://you.38degrees.org.uk/petitions/stop-the-sale-of-sekhemka-by-northampton-council
Then read the full story here:
http://english.ahram.org.eg/News/105605.aspx